Volvo XC60 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 2010 engine produces 61 HP less power than Volvo XC60 2013, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC60 2013. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 2010 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2010 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60 2013, which means Volvo XC60 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`810 kg | 1`835 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 620 kg | 605 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 12 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |