Volvo XC60 2020 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
Hybrid engines (Volvo XC60) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Volvo XC90), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 253 HP | 225 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 470 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 28 HP more power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.0 | 5.8 | |
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 71 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 3500 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 2.01 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
Volvo XC60 is smaller. Volvo XC60 is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 468 litres | 615 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1886 litres | |
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Volvo XC60 has 147 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 491 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`660 | 2`750 | |
Safety: | |||
The Volvo XC90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 27 200 | 26 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |