Volvo XC60 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.4 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 185 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 189 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.1 | 1.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2380 km in combined cycle | 2500 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Volvo XC60 and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | 1602 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 42 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |