Volvo XC60 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Volvo XC60 and Volvo XC90 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is smaller. Volvo XC60 is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo XC60 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Volvo XC60 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 454 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo XC90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |