Volvo XC60 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 174 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 213 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo XC60 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). Toyota RAV4 2015: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by sending up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC60 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 15 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC60 has 72 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 29 400 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |