Volvo XC60 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Volvo XC60 engine produces 29 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 16 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo XC60 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 400 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |