Volvo XC60 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo XC60 engine produces 99 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.7 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Volvo XC60 and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |