Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 50 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.2
6.4
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.
Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.69 m
4.70 m
Width:
2.00 m
1.88 m
Height:
1.66 m
1.69 m
Volvo XC60 is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq, 12 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 3 cm lower.
Seats:
no data
7 seats
Trunk capacity:
505 litres
230 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:
no data
230 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:
505 litres
no data
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1432 litres
1950 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 518 litres).
Turning diameter:
11.4 meters
12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
