Volvo XC60 2017 vs Porsche Macan 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 62 HP less power than Porsche Macan, but torque is 30 NM more than Porsche Macan. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.4 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo XC60 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Porsche Macan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 and Porsche Macan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | 1795 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Macan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Macan (by 363 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Porsche Macan, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Porsche Macan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Porsche Macan, so Porsche Macan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 63 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Porsche Macan has
| |