Volvo XC60 2017 vs Jaguar I-Pace 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 696 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar I-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 210 HP less power than Jaguar I-Pace, whereas torque is 296 NM less than Jaguar I-Pace. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 23.6 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 10.10 € | 7.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 90 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.57 m | |
| Volvo XC60 and Jaguar I-Pace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 656 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1432 litres | 1163 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 151 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar I-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 1 metres less than that of the Jaguar I-Pace, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`670 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests, but Jaguar I-Pace is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Jaguar I-Pace has
| |