Volvo XC60 2017 vs Audi Q5 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 14 HP less power than Audi Q5, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo XC60 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC60 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC60 and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | 1520 litres | |
| Volvo XC60 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 88 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 45 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |