Volvo XC60 2017 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio is a more dynamic driving. Volvo XC60 engine produces 90 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Stelvio, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo XC60 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo XC60 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, which means that by driving the Volvo XC60 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo XC60 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2017: The Active Transfer Case (ATC) can transfer up to 50 percent of engine torque to the front wheels by monitoring grip conditions and driver input. | |||
Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Volvo XC60 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo XC60 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 525 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1432 litres | no data | |
Volvo XC60 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
Safety: | |||
Volvo XC60 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC60 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 27 200 | 39 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Alfa Romeo Stelvio has
| |