Volvo XC60 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 306 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 - 440 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 10.7 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Volvo XC60 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Volvo XC60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 is larger. Volvo XC60 is 9 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 1053 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1455 litres | 2008 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 553 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`401 kg | ~ 2`133 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`837 kg | ~ 1`573 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 564 kg | ~ 560 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 9800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |