Volvo XC60 2008 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 - 285 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
Torque: | 300 - 440 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 11.9 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
Volvo XC60 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Volvo XC60 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
Volvo XC60 is smaller. Volvo XC60 is 18 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo XC60 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1837 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo XC60 has 246 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 382 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Volvo XC60 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`499 | ~ 2`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | low | |
Average price (€): | 9000 | 8400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |