Volvo XC60 2008 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 285 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 440 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 11.9 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60 2013. On average, Volvo XC60 2008 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo XC60 2008 is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60 2013, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1455 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2008 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60 2013, which means Volvo XC60 2008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`499 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 15 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |