Volvo XC60 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo XC60
2008 - 2013
Toyota RAV4
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 163 - 285 HP150 - 177 HP
Torque: 300 - 440 NM198 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 10.9 seconds9.3 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 11.96.0 - 9.6
Volvo XC60 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Volvo XC60 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 230 mm (9.1 inches)182 - 191 mm (7.2 - 7.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.39 m
Width: 1.89 m1.83 m
Height: 1.71 m1.71 m
Volvo XC60 is larger.
Volvo XC60 is 24 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres586 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1455 litres1752 litres
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo XC60 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Volvo XC60 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 297 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Volvo XC60 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`499~ 2`137
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 94009800
Pros and Cons: Volvo XC60 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Toyota RAV4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv