Volvo XC60 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo XC60 2017 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 320 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 480 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 10.2 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 2017 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo XC60 2013. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.0 - 7.7 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60 2013. On average, Volvo XC60 2017 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 - 400 mm (8.5 - 15.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017 is larger, but lower. Volvo XC60 2017 is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC60 2013, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo XC60 2017 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1432 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo XC60 2017 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60 2013. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`507 kg | ~ 2`401 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`007 kg | ~ 1`827 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 500 kg | ~ 574 kg | |
| Volvo XC60 2017 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volvo XC60 2013. Therefore, Volvo XC60 2013 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo XC60 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |
