Volvo V70 2013 vs Mazda 6 2013

 
Volvo V70
2013 - 2016
Mazda 6
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10 seconds
Volvo V70 engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.9
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1420 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1620 km on highway1470 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.81 m4.80 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.55 m1.48 m
Volvo V70 is larger.
Volvo V70 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V70 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 575 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1580 litresno data
Volvo V70 has more luggage capacity.
Volvo V70 has 73 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Volvo V70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3102`110
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Volvo V70 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volvo V70 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 90007400
Pros and Cons: Volvo V70 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 6 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv