Volvo V70 2013 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Volvo V70 and Ford Mondeo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.8 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V70 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1660 km in combined cycle | 1650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1790 km on highway | 1800 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 151 mm (5.9 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V70 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V70 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volvo V70 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Volvo V70 2013 1.6 engine: The main issues reported by owners are frequent oil and coolant leaks. The Siemens fuel system with piezo injectors is highly sensitive to fuel quality, requiring the use of high-grade diesel to avoid ... More about Volvo V70 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.50 m | |
| Volvo V70 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V70 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 488 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V70 has 87 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The Ford Mondeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Volvo V70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |