Volvo V70 2007 vs Renault Laguna 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 35 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo V70 2007 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo V70 2007 2.4 engine Renault Laguna 2007 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo V70 is larger. Volvo V70 is 2 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V70 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 508 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V70 has 67 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Volvo V70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`107 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |