Volvo V70 2005 vs Volvo S60 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.6 | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V70 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo V70 is 13 cm longer than the Volvo S60, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V70 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | 1034 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V70 has 61 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 607 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Volvo V70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |