Volvo V70 2005 vs Volvo XC70 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 22 HP more power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo XC70. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC70 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Volvo V70 is smaller. Volvo V70 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | 1641 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC70 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |