Volvo V70 2005 vs Audi A6 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 185 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Volvo V70 engine produces 5 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | Used also on Audi A4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
Volvo V70 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo V70 is 22 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 565 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | no data | |
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Volvo V70 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`325 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Audi A6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V70, so Audi A6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |