Volvo V70 2000 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 41 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Subaru Outback. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.58 m | |
| Volvo V70 and Subaru Outback are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 464 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V70 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |