Volvo V70 2002 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 1 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Subaru Outback. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V70 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.58 m | |
| Volvo V70 and Subaru Outback are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 464 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V70 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
| |