Volvo V70 1996 vs Volvo S60 2004

	Volvo V70 1996 - 2000	Volvo S60 2004 - 2009
Body:	Estate car / wagon	Sedan
	The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	225 HP	180 HP
Torque:	310 NM	240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.8 seconds	8.8 seconds
	Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 45 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	11.2	9.2
Real fuel consumption:	12.2 l/100km	10.1 l/100km
	The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity:	70 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	620 km in combined cycle	760 km in combined cycle
	850 km on highway	980 km on highway
	570 km with real consumption	690 km with real consumption
	Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.73 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.43 m
	Volvo V70 is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:	420 litres	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	1580 litres	1034 litres
Turning diameter:	no data	11 meters
Gross weight:	1`970 kg	2`010 kg
Net weight:	1`470 kg	1`533 kg
Load capacity:	500 kg	477 kg

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	average
Average price (€):	1600	2400
Rating in user reviews:	8.1/10	8.3/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo V70 has more power more dynamic lower price	Volvo S60 has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo V70 1996 vs Volvo S60 2004

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions