Volvo V70 2000 vs Volvo V70 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 285 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Volvo V70 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 2000 engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo V70 2004, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volvo V70 2004. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.8 | |
The Volvo V70 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V70 2000 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 2000 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Volvo V70 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V70 2004 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Volvo V70 2004 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Volvo V70 2004 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo V70 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V70 2000 and Volvo V70 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1641 litres | 1641 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V70 2000 is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo V70 2004, which means Volvo V70 2000 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |