Volvo V70 1998 vs Volvo S40 2002
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V70 engine produces 114 HP more power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Volvo S40. Thanks to more power Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V70 could require 510 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volvo V70 is larger. Volvo V70 is 24 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 853 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo V70 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. This could mean that the Volvo V70 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 727 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo S40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo S40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |