Volvo V70 1999 vs SAAB 9-5 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volvo V70 and SAAB 9-5 have the same engine power, but Volvo V70 torque is 50 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.4 | |
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V70 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 320'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V70 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volvo V70 1999 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo V70 1999 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
Volvo V70 is smaller. Volvo V70 is 9 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.6 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Volvo V70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
SAAB 9-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than SAAB 9-5, so SAAB 9-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 9.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |