Volvo V70 1999 vs SAAB 9-5 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-5 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V70 engine produces 30 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, whereas torque is 60 NM less than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Volvo V70 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V70 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Volvo V70 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V70 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V70 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volvo V70 is smaller. Volvo V70 is 9 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.6 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Volvo V70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| SAAB 9-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than SAAB 9-5, so SAAB 9-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
SAAB 9-5 has
| |