Volvo V70 2013 vs Volvo XC70 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 304 HP | 163 - 304 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 440 NM | 350 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 13.2 seconds | 6.8 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 10.2 | 4.5 - 10.6 | |
Volvo V70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, Volvo V70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 151 mm (5.9 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC70 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.60 m | |
Volvo V70 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC70, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V70 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 575 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1580 litres | 1600 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means Volvo V70 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`277 | ~ 2`360 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 8600 | 13 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V70 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |