Volvo V70 2007 vs Audi A6 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Volvo V70
2007 - 2011
- choose version -
Volvo V70 2.4D | 163 HP | Diesel | Manual
Volvo V70 2.4D | 163 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Volvo V70 2.5T | 200 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo V70 2.5T | 200 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo V70 3.2 | 238 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo V70 D5 | 185 HP | Diesel | Manual
Volvo V70 D5 | 185 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Volvo V70 T6 AWD | 285 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
VOLVO V70 1.6 T4 FWD | 180 HP | Petrol | Automatic
VOLVO V70 1.6 T4 FWD | 180 HP | Petrol | Manual
VOLVO V70 2.0 FWD | 145 HP | Petrol | Manual
VOLVO V70 2.0 T5 FWD | 245 HP | Petrol | Automatic
VOLVO V70 2.0 T5 FWD | 241 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo V70 3.0 | 304 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
VOLVO V70 3.2 AWD | 243 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
VOLVO V70 1.6 D2 FWD | 115 HP | Diesel | Automatic
VOLVO V70 1.6 D2 FWD | 114 HP | Diesel | Manual
VOLVO V70 2.0 D3 FWD | 136 HP | Diesel | Manual
VOLVO V70 2.0 D3 FWD | 136 HP | Diesel | Automatic
VOLVO V70 2.0 D4 | 181 HP | Diesel | Manual
VOLVO V70 2.0 D4 AWD | 163 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
VOLVO V70 2.0 D4 FWD | 163 HP | Diesel | Automatic
VOLVO V70 2.0 D4 FWD | 163 HP | Diesel | Manual
VOLVO V70 2.4 D4 | 181 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
VOLVO V70 2.4 D5 AWD | 215 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
VOLVO V70 2.4 D5 FWD | 215 HP | Diesel | Automatic
VOLVO V70 2.4 D5 FWD | 215 HP | Diesel | Manual
Volvo V70 2.5 T | 231 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo V70 2.5 T | 231 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo V70 2.0 T | 203 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo V70 2.0 T | 203 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo V70 2.0 D | 136 HP | Diesel | Manual
Audi A6
2008 - 2011
- choose version -
Audi A6 Avant 2.0 T FSI | 170 HP | Petrol | Manual
Audi A6 Avant 2.0 T FSI | 170 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Audi A6 Avant 2.0 TDI | 136 HP | Diesel | Manual
Audi A6 Avant 2.0 TDI | 136 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI | 190 HP | Diesel | Manual
Audi A6 Avant 2.7 TDI | 190 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Avant 2.7 TDI quattro | 190 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
Avant 2.8 FSI | 190 HP | Petrol | Manual
Avant 2.8 FSI | 190 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Avant 2.8 FSI | 220 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Avant 2.8 FSI quattro | 190 HP | Petrol | Manual | 4x4
Avant 2.8 FSI quattro | 220 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Avant 3.0 T FSI quattro | 290 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Avant 3.0 TDI quattro | 240 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
Avant 3.0 TDI quattro | 240 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
Avant 4.2 FSI quattro | 350 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Gearbox:
Manual/Automatic Manual/Automatic
Engines:
1.6 - 3.2 2.0 - 4.2
Performance
Power:
114 - 304 HP 136 - 350 HP
Torque:
190 - 441 NM 280 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
6.9 - 13.2 seconds 6.1 - 10.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
4.3 - 11.3 5.3 - 10.2
Volvo V70 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A6. On average, Volvo V70 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version !
Dimensions
Length:
4.82 m 4.93 m
Width:
1.86 m 1.86 m
Height:
1.54 m 1.46 m
Volvo V70 is 11 cm shorter than the Audi A6, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo V70 is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:
575 litres 565 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V70 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. The Audi A6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter:
11.7 meters 12 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V70 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6.
Gross weight (kg):
~ 2`292 ~ 2`340
Safety:
no data
Quality:
average
above average
Average price (€):
4600 6000
Rating in user reviews:
7.9 /10
9.1 /10
Pros and Cons:
Volvo V70 has
lower fuel consumption for diesel engines lower price
Audi A6 has
lower fuel consumption for petrol engines fewer faults higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail