Volvo V70 1996 vs Volvo V70 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Volvo V70 1996 - 2000	Volvo V70 2000 - 2004
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	2.0 - 2.5	2.3 - 2.5
Performance
Power:	126 - 265 HP	140 - 300 HP
Torque:	170 - 350 NM	192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.8 - 12.5 seconds	5.9 - 11.9 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.3 - 12.2	6.5 - 13.6
	Volvo V70 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70 2000. On average, Volvo V70 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.72 m	4.71 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.42 m	1.49 m
	Volvo V70 1996 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V70 2000, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V70 1996 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	420 litres	485 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1580 litres	1641 litres
	Volvo V70 2000 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo V70 1996 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70 2000. This could mean that the Volvo V70 1996 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 2000 (by 61 litres).
Turning diameter:	11.3 meters	13.2 meters
	The turning circle of the Volvo V70 1996 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V70 2000, which means Volvo V70 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`994	~ 2`123

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	below average
Average price (€):	1000	1600
Rating in user reviews:	8.1/10	8.1/10
Pros and Cons:	Volvo V70 has lower fuel consumption for diesel engines better manoeuvrability lower price	Volvo V70 has lower fuel consumption for petrol engines roomier boot fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volvo V70 1996 vs Volvo V70 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions