Volvo V40 2002 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo V40 engine produces 40 HP more power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Suzuki Baleno. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Baleno engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen Xantia, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volvo V40 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Volvo V40 2002 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo V40 is larger, but lower. Volvo V40 is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V40 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1377 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage capacity. Volvo V40 has 38 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Baleno. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 43 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Volvo V40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |