Volvo V40 2002 vs Fiat Stilo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 and Fiat Stilo have the same engine power, but Volvo V40 torque is 10 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
| By specification Volvo V40 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Volvo V40 is smaller. Volvo V40 is 4 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |