Volvo V40 2002 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 2002 engine produces 2 HP less power than Volvo V40 2000, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Volvo V40 2000. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.1 | |
|
The Volvo V40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 2002 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 2002 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2002 and Volvo V40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |