Volvo V40 2000 vs Volvo V40 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 2000 engine produces 64 HP more power than Volvo V40 2002, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Volvo V40 2002. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.9 | |
|
The Volvo V40 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 2000 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 2000 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2000 and Volvo V40 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1421 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |