Volvo V40 2000 vs Volvo V40 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 2000 engine produces 29 HP more power than Volvo V40 2002, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40 2002. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.9 | |
| Volvo V40 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2000 and Volvo V40 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1421 litres | |
| Volvo V40 2000 has 57 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 2002 (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
| |