Volvo V40 2000 vs Volvo V40 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 2000 engine produces 13 HP more power than Volvo V40 2002, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40 2002. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 2000 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Volvo V40 2000 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2000 and Volvo V40 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
| |