Volvo V40 2000 vs Peugeot 307 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 engine produces 12 HP more power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Peugeot 307. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.51 m | |
| Volvo V40 is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 307, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1540 litres | |
| Volvo V40 has 73 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Volvo V40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`984 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volvo V40 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Volvo V40 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |