Volvo V40 2000 vs Volvo V40 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Volvo V40 2000 and Volvo V40 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo V40 2000 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 2000 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 2000 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 2000 and Volvo V40 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
| |