Volvo V40 1999 vs SAAB 9-3 1998
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo V40 engine produces 6 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 13 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Thanks to more power Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.1 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
| Volvo V40 is 16 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V40 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.1 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |