Volvo V40 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Volvo V40 1999 and Volvo V40 2000 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
| By specification Volvo V40 1999 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 1999 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 1999 and Volvo V40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 1421 litres | |
| Volvo V40 1999 has 57 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40 2000. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 2000 (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |