Volvo V40 1996 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 1996 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V40 2000, but torque is 7 NM less than Volvo V40 2000. Despite the higher power, Volvo V40 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.1 | |
| Volvo V40 1996 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 1996 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 1996 and Volvo V40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1421 litres | 1421 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |