Volvo V40 1996 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Volvo V40 1996 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V40 2000, but torque is 7 NM less than Volvo V40 2000. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 1996 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 1996 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 1996 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 1996 and Volvo V40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 413 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1421 litres | 1421 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |