Volvo V40 1997 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 engine produces 46 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 164 NM less than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo V40 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo V40 is smaller. Volvo V40 is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1421 litres | 1307 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volvo V40 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volvo V50 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 395 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |