Volvo V40 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 1999 engine produces 7 HP less power than Volvo V40 2000, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volvo V40 2000. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo V40 1999 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 1999 could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo V40 1999 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 1999 and Volvo V40 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |