Volvo V40 1999 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving. Volvo V40 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
| By specification Volvo V40 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo V40 and Mitsubishi Carisma are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |