Volvo V40 1999 vs Volkswagen Bora 1999

 
Volvo V40
1999 - 2000
Volkswagen Bora
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 95 HP115 HP
Torque: 190 NM285 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds11 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo V40 engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Volvo V40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo V40 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo V40 could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo V40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1240 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.41 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.47 m
Volvo V40 is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo V40 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data460 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora, which means Volvo V40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`880
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 6001400
Rating in user reviews: 6.4/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo V40 has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Bora has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv