Volvo V40 1999 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo V40 engine produces 20 HP more power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Suzuki Baleno. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.0 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo V40 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Volvo V40 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volvo V40 is larger, but lower. Volvo V40 is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo V40 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1377 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo V40 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Volvo V40 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo V40 has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |